• No products in the cart.

Profile Photo

  • Webinar No: WBNR 1198
  • PDH Units: 2

No data found for Custom Course Number

No data found for Custom Course Units

$139.00

Profile Photo

  • Webinar No: WBNR 1198
  • PDH Units: 2

$139.00

Intended Audience:: All Engineers
Credits: 2 PDH Units
When: Wednesday 4/30, 2 - 4 pm ET

On March 26, 2024, the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapsed when the container ship Dali lost electric power and propulsion and impacted one of the main piers of the bridge. The collapse resulted in six deaths and an estimated six billion dollars in property and economic loss. This catastrophe was 100% preventable if the electrical engineers in charge of the electrical system of the ship, mechanical engineers in charge of the propulsion and rudder control, or the bridge engineers in charge of the structural safety of the bridge piers had fulfilled their responsibility to "Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public" as the 1st Canon of the Code of Ethics for Engineers states. All three groups failed to do so. After the 1980 ship collision collapse of the Florida Sunshine Skyway Bridge, where 35 people perished, the FHWA/AASHTO developed specific bridge engineering Guide Specification (i.e. standard) on how to establish the probability of a catastrophic bridge collapse in case of a ship collision incident. If that probability exceeded one in 10,000, the Guide Specification had specific procedures on how to strengthen the piers to withstand the ship impact or to design and construct protection systems such as dolphins at a short distance from the pier to prevent the ship impacting the pier. FHWA released the Guide Specification in 1991, and any bridge exposed to ship collision built after 1996 had to satisfy the requirements of this FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specifications. There were no requirements for the potentially vulnerable existing bridges to be evaluated for this severe safety problem and retrofitted if needed.  If bridge engineers at Maryland Transportation Authority, especially the Chief Bridge Engineers, had been concerned with this safety issue and had conducted a ship collision vulnerability study, they would have found out that the probability of catastrophic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge was 32 times the limit set by the FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specification as the post-collapse investigation of the NTSB established. The first part of the webinar will discuss ship’s and bridge’s vulnerabilities, and the cause of the collapse. The second part of the webinar focuses on the engineering ethics violations in the design, inspection, and maintenance of both the ship and the bridge. Finally, Dr. Astaneh will discuss the lessons that we can learn from this case on how not only we "hold safety paramount” in our engineering practice, but also to be able to convince the policymakers and those in charge of budget allocation that they too need to place the highest priority on the safety, especially when, as the case was here, there is solid engineering evidence that most likely there is a public safety catastrophe in the horizon and had to be mitigated as soon as possible. References and Recommended Further Readings:

  1. Guide Specification and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges Volume I: Final Report, (1991), Report No. FHWA-RD-91-006, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA. https://publications.iowa.gov/49122/1/guide_apecs_commentary_vessel_collision_design_bridges_1991_OCR_.pdf
  2. AASHTO Guide Specifications and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges 2nd Edition 2010 Interim Revisions, (2010). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.
  3. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9thEd. With 2015 Interim Revisions. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.
  4. NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE).  https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEthicsforEngineers.pdf
  5. NSPE Ethics Reference Guide https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/EthicsReferenceGuide.pdf
  6. ASCE- 2020 Code of Ethics-The American Society of Civil Engineers, https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and-growth/ethics/documents/asce-code-ethics.pdf
  7. ASME- CODE OF ETHICS OF ENGINEERS, (1976),  https://www.asme.org/wwwasmeorg/media/resourcefiles/aboutasme/get%20involved/advocacy/policy-publications/p-15-7-ethics.pdf
  8. IIEE Code of Ethics, (2020) https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/about/corporate/ieee-code-of-ethics.pdf
  9. Concepts and Cases-Engineering Ethics, a textbook by Charles E. Harris et al., published by Cengage, 2019.
  10. Ethics, Technology, and Engineering, a textbook by Ibo van de Poel and Lambèr Royakkers, Wily-Blackwell, 2011.
  11. The Ethical Executive, a 2010 book by Robert Hoyk and Paul Hersey, Stanford Business Books.
  12. Contact of Containership Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, Preliminary Report, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC. https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17620690&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=DCA24MM031_PreliminaryReport%203-Rel.pdf
  13. NTSB Docket DCA24MM031. Contains 40 Investigative Documents on the Contact of Containership Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge. NTSB Number DCA24MM031, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC. https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/about/corporate/ieee-code-of-ethics.pdf
  14. NOVA Baltimore Bridge Collapse, 53-minute Video, Aired 2/26/2025. Available publicly at: https://www.pbs.org/video/baltimore-bridge-collapse-r7gz2v/.

Date: Wednesday April 30, 2025 .  2 - 4 pm ET

Credits: 2 PDH Units

Learning Objectives

At the successful conclusion of this course, you’ll be able to identify and discuss:
  • The Francis Scott Key Bridge's structural system with a focus on the impacted pier and its ship-collision protection system.
  • The electrical and mechanical systems in the containership Dali involved in causing the collision.
  • A summary of a few catastrophic ship collisions with the bridge piers.
  • Important items from the 1991 FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specification for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges that if had been followed, this tragic collapse could have been easily prevented.
  • What was the mechanism of failure that led to the loss of electric power and propulsion in the containership Dali, and how could the failure have been prevented?
  • How and why did the impact of the containership Dali result in such a sudden and complete collapse of the Key Bridge?
  • How could the catastrophic collapse have been prevented at the design, inspection, and maintenance level of the ship or the bridge?
  • How could the redundancy and parallel lines in electrical, mechanical, and structural systems have prevented this catastrophe?
  • What were the main violations of the Code of Ethics for Engineers in this case?
  • Why several violations of the "Code of Ethics for Engineers" resulted in the tragic loss of lives of six people and a significant economic loss.
  • What lessons can we, as engineers, learn from this catastrophe to prevent such tragedies in the future?
Biography Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Ph.D., P.E. Dr. Abolhassan Astaneh is a professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, and a 2013 Minner Faculty Fellow in Engineering Ethics and Social/Professional Responsibility in the College of Engineering. He won the 1998 T.R. Higgins Lectureship Award of the American Institute of Steel Construction, the most prestigious award in his field. He is a licensed civil engineering Professional Engineer (P.E.) in California. Dr. Astaneh is currently a structural engineering and bridge engineering consultant and an expert witness in court cases. He continues his research and publication of technical information and gives lectures and webinars/seminars in structural engineering, earthquake engineering, and engineering ethics.  He has published over 300 journal papers, conference proceedings, technical reports, and book chapters. He has had hundreds of press interviews on technical aspects of subjects in his areas of interest. He has taught, researched, designed, and consulted on steel, steel-concrete, concrete, and timber buildings and bridges, failure analysis of buildings, bridges, and other structures, blast protection of structures, and protection of buildings, bridges, and other structures against terrorist attacks. He has been involved in designing, constructing, researching, teaching, and studying buildings and bridges for 56 years, including buildings up to 73 stories and long-span bridges such as the Golden Gate Bridge and the Bay Bridge. Dr. Astaneh has performed failure analysis of several collapsed structures, including the World Trade Center Towers, the I-35W Bridge in Minnesota, the I-5 Bridge in Washington State, and the Florida FIU Pedestrian Bridge.  He has taught seminar courses and several N-Cite Engineering Hub webinars on engineering ethics.

Webinar No: WBNR 1198
PDH Units: 2

Prime PDH Day is back with TWO days to save big. Prime PDH sale starts Tuesday July 16 and Ends Wednesday July 17 11:59 pm, 2024.
Buy any Online Course or Webinar NOW and save 50% - as many as you need
No Limits - No Restrictions
Discount Code: PRIME24
https://nciteengineeringhub.com/

Please Join us for our next live interactive presentation tomorrow (Wednesday, 6/5, 2pmET).
https://nciteengineeringhub.com/course/live-webinar-essentials-of-photovoltaic-system-design/

ACCEPTANCE GUARANTEE


ncees

Ncite Engineering Hub engineering courses & live webinars meet NCEES Guidelines for Professional Engineer licenses renewal in all 50 states.

Ncite Engineering Hub will refund your money if the PDH credits you earn are rejected by your state board for any reason.

top
Copyright 2025 · All Rights Reserved. Ncite Engineering Hub, LLC 513 E- Main Street # 981 Charlottesville, VA 22902 USA