
- Webinar No: WBNR 1198
- PDH Units: 2
No data found for Custom Course Number
No data found for Custom Course Units
Intended Audience:: All Engineers
Credits: 2 PDH Units
When: Wednesday 4/30, 2 - 4 pm ET
On March 26, 2024, the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore collapsed when the container ship Dali lost electric power and propulsion and impacted one of the main piers of the bridge. The collapse resulted in six deaths and an estimated six billion dollars in property and economic loss. This catastrophe was 100% preventable if the electrical engineers in charge of the electrical system of the ship, mechanical engineers in charge of the propulsion and rudder control, or the bridge engineers in charge of the structural safety of the bridge piers had fulfilled their responsibility to "Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public" as the 1st Canon of the Code of Ethics for Engineers states. All three groups failed to do so. After the 1980 ship collision collapse of the Florida Sunshine Skyway Bridge, where 35 people perished, the FHWA/AASHTO developed specific bridge engineering Guide Specification (i.e. standard) on how to establish the probability of a catastrophic bridge collapse in case of a ship collision incident. If that probability exceeded one in 10,000, the Guide Specification had specific procedures on how to strengthen the piers to withstand the ship impact or to design and construct protection systems such as dolphins at a short distance from the pier to prevent the ship impacting the pier. FHWA released the Guide Specification in 1991, and any bridge exposed to ship collision built after 1996 had to satisfy the requirements of this FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specifications. There were no requirements for the potentially vulnerable existing bridges to be evaluated for this severe safety problem and retrofitted if needed.ย If bridge engineers at Maryland Transportation Authority, especially the Chief Bridge Engineers, had been concerned with this safety issue and had conducted a ship collision vulnerability study, they would have found out that the probability of catastrophic collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge was 32 times the limit set by the FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specification as the post-collapse investigation of the NTSB established. The first part of the webinar will discuss shipโs and bridgeโs vulnerabilities, and the cause of the collapse. The second part of the webinar focuses on the engineering ethics violations in the design, inspection, and maintenance of both the ship and the bridge. Finally, Dr. Astaneh will discuss the lessons that we can learn from this case on how not only we "hold safety paramountโ in our engineering practice, but also to be able to convince the policymakers and those in charge of budget allocation that they too need to place the highest priority on the safety, especially when, as the case was here, there is solid engineering evidence that most likely there is a public safety catastrophe in the horizon and had to be mitigated as soon as possible. References and Recommended Further Readings:
- Guide Specification and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges Volume I: Final Report, (1991), Report No. FHWA-RD-91-006, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA. https://publications.iowa.gov/49122/1/guide_apecs_commentary_vessel_collision_design_bridges_1991_OCR_.pdf
- AASHTO Guide Specifications and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges 2nd Edition 2010 Interim Revisions, (2010). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.
- AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9thEd. With 2015 Interim Revisions. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC.
- NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE).ย https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/NSPECodeofEthicsforEngineers.pdf
- NSPE Ethics Reference Guide https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/EthicsReferenceGuide.pdf
- ASCE- 2020 Code of Ethics-The American Society of Civil Engineers, https://www.asce.org/-/media/asce-images-and-files/career-and-growth/ethics/documents/asce-code-ethics.pdf
- ASME- CODE OF ETHICS OF ENGINEERS, (1976), ย https://www.asme.org/wwwasmeorg/media/resourcefiles/aboutasme/get%20involved/advocacy/policy-publications/p-15-7-ethics.pdf
- IIEE Code of Ethics, (2020) https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/about/corporate/ieee-code-of-ethics.pdf
- Concepts and Cases-Engineering Ethics, a textbook by Charles E. Harris et al., published by Cengage, 2019.
- Ethics, Technology, and Engineering, a textbook by Ibo van de Poel and Lambรจr Royakkers, Wily-Blackwell, 2011.
- The Ethical Executive, a 2010 book by Robert Hoyk and Paul Hersey, Stanford Business Books.
- Contact of Containership Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge and Subsequent Bridge Collapse, Preliminary Report, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC. https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17620690&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=DCA24MM031_PreliminaryReport%203-Rel.pdf
- NTSB Docket DCA24MM031. Contains 40 Investigative Documents on the Contact of Containership Dali with the Francis Scott Key Bridge. NTSB Number DCA24MM031, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC. https://www.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-org/ieee/web/org/about/corporate/ieee-code-of-ethics.pdf
- NOVA Baltimore Bridge Collapse, 53-minute Video, Aired 2/26/2025. Available publicly at: https://www.pbs.org/video/baltimore-bridge-collapse-r7gz2v/.
Date: Wednesday April 30, 2025 .ย 2 - 4 pm ET
Credits: 2 PDH Units
Learning Objectives
At the successful conclusion of this course, youโll be able to identify and discuss:- The Francis Scott Key Bridge's structural system with a focus on the impacted pier and its ship-collision protection system.
- The electrical and mechanical systems in the containership Dali involved in causing the collision.
- A summary of a few catastrophic ship collisions with the bridge piers.
- Important items from the 1991 FHWA/AASHTO Guide Specification for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges that if had been followed, this tragic collapse could have been easily prevented.
- What was the mechanism of failure that led to the loss of electric power and propulsion in the containership Dali, and how could the failure have been prevented?
- How and why did the impact of the containership Dali result in such a sudden and complete collapse of the Key Bridge?
- How could the catastrophic collapse have been prevented at the design, inspection, and maintenance level of the ship or the bridge?
- How could the redundancy and parallel lines in electrical, mechanical, and structural systems have prevented this catastrophe?
- What were the main violations of the Code of Ethics for Engineers in this case?
- Why several violations of the "Code of Ethics for Engineers" resulted in the tragic loss of lives of six people and a significant economic loss.
- What lessons can we, as engineers, learn from this catastrophe to prevent such tragedies in the future?
Once completed, your order and certificate of completion will be available in your profile when you’re logged in to the site.